There are not any federal laws that explicitly address employee personal information protection. Laws such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the 1974 Data Privacy Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) indirectly speak to employee data protection. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) addresses the confidentiality of employee medical records. Some states, such as California, have enacted data privacy legislation.
Generally, employees do not have a right to expect privacy in the workplace, and employers may use
drug testing, workplace surveillance and lifestyle discrimination as a condition of employment. Employers may not, however, disclose private information, or they could be held liable for invasion of privacy.
The American Data Privacy and Protection Act (ADPPA), introduced in 2022, is a federal bill that would replace the current patchwork of privacy laws with a comprehensive structure of privacy rights and an oversight and enforcement mechanism. It was not enacted in 2022 or 2023. However, the idea has bipartisan support, and it could become law in the future.
Provisions of ADPPA include:
The European Union has its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), but there is no equivalent overarching security law in the US. Instead, there is a mishmash of state and local laws, and there are federal laws that indirectly address data protection.
None of these specifically address employee data privacy. California has enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which is a comprehensive privacy law similar to the EU’s GDPR. At least five other states have similar laws pending. In addition, many states have extended the provisions of the FCRA with additional regulations around collecting data in the course of background checks.
Because of the jumble of privacy laws, there isn’t a legal template that employers can implement to ensure employee data privacy. Here are some practices they should consider in the absence of a comprehensive data security law:
Laws around the retention of employee data are vague. There are no specific maximum or minimum time limits, other than to state that data should be kept no longer than necessary. Any data no longer required, either digital or on paper, must be securely destroyed.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) requires that employee personal information be retained for at least one year. Payroll information must be kept for three years.
It’s a common practice for employers to destroy personal information after three years. They may retain it longer if there are court disputes that may require it. An individual may request that their former employer destroy their personal data. However, the employer is under no obligation to accede to this request. They will not do so if federal and state laws require them to retain it.
CRAs are in the business of collecting data, including data from previous employers, and data privacy restrictions limit what data they are permitted to collect as well as what they use it for. Many of the restrictions are due to state and local laws. For example, in some jurisdictions, CRAs may not be able to discover and report older criminal records.
Employers and CRAs are already required to obtain consent from potential employees before conducting background checks. They must make a copy of the background report available to the applicant and give them the opportunity to dispute inaccuracies.
Data privacy laws are likely to become more restrictive about what personal data is available and how it may be used. This will present a greater challenge to CRAs in conducting effective yet legal background checks.
There is no comprehensive federal data privacy law, although it’s possible that one will be enacted in the next few years. In the meantime, employee data privacy is governed by state laws and indirectly by the provisions of several federal laws. Employers need to establish their own best practices for safeguarding employee data.
The trend is for less and less employee data to be legally available and usable by employers and CRAs that conduct background checks. That's why CRAs should rely on a
background check wholesaler such as Eagle Eye Screening Solutions. We keep abreast of the most current federal, state and local law, and we have the technology and the nationwide scope to compliantly provide the information that employers require.